Re: TCP_HIT vs TCP_MEM_HIT speed.

On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> Greg Maxwell wrote:
>
> > Looking at my Calamaris output I see:
> >
> > TCP_HIT 10383 25.25 48853 26.84 0 97.95
> > TCP_MEM_HIT 653 1.59 1395 0.77 0 46.21
> >
> > It kind of puzzles me that MEM_HIT is slower the TCP_HIT, as I though that
> > MEM_HITs were hot objects and the others were off disk?
>
> Not sure on the exact output of calamaris, but that looks like
> TCP_MEM_HIT is faster than TCP_HIT to me... (every column is a smaller
> value). Never used calamaris so I may have completely misunderstood the
> output..

Sorry, should have copied the topline,
the format is:

status request % kByte % sec kB/sec

So the last column is kB/sec.
Received on Mon Feb 07 2000 - 14:08:55 MST