Re: TCP_HIT vs TCP_MEM_HIT speed.

Greg Maxwell wrote:

> > Greg Maxwell wrote:
> >
> > > Looking at my Calamaris output I see:
> > >
> > > TCP_HIT 10383 25.25 48853 26.84 0 97.95
> > > TCP_MEM_HIT 653 1.59 1395 0.77 0 46.21

> Sorry, should have copied the topline,
> the format is:
>
> status request % kByte % sec kB/sec
>
> So the last column is kB/sec.

Ok, then your question does make some sense.

However, it is to few requests to say anything useful from. The
statistical variation is too large. It may well be that there are a few
large TCP_HIT messages which causes the kb/second to be high.

My experience is that TCP_MEM_HIT is faster than TCP_HIT, but I have
never measured it as average kb/s, only as request latency.

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Squid hacker