Re: TCP_HIT vs TCP_MEM_HIT speed.

Greg Maxwell wrote:

> Looking at my Calamaris output I see:
>
> TCP_HIT 10383 25.25 48853 26.84 0 97.95
> TCP_MEM_HIT 653 1.59 1395 0.77 0 46.21
>
> It kind of puzzles me that MEM_HIT is slower the TCP_HIT, as I though that
> MEM_HITs were hot objects and the others were off disk?

Not sure on the exact output of calamaris, but that looks like
TCP_MEM_HIT is faster than TCP_HIT to me... (every column is a smaller
value). Never used calamaris so I may have completely misunderstood the
output..

--
Henrik Nordstrom