Thank you.
I'll let it run all night to make sure.
John Craws
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On 11/01/11 09:47, John Craws wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just did a few tests using 3.1.10 and the issue appears to be fixed.
>>
>> I browsed the changelog but could not find something that seemed to be
>> directly related. Is it a side effect of another fix? If so, which
>> one?
>>
>> I'll keep testing, but it's promising.
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>>
>> John Craws
>>
>
> That sounds like a side effect of the bug 3113 and 3096 fixes. Between them
> they limit the amount of RAM Squid uses for in-transit requests and release
> the individual I/O blocks immediately.
>
> Amos
> --
> Please be using
> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.10
> Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.4
>
Received on Tue Jan 11 2011 - 02:05:16 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 11 2011 - 12:00:04 MST