On 11/01/11 09:47, John Craws wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just did a few tests using 3.1.10 and the issue appears to be fixed.
>
> I browsed the changelog but could not find something that seemed to be
> directly related. Is it a side effect of another fix? If so, which
> one?
>
> I'll keep testing, but it's promising.
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> John Craws
>
That sounds like a side effect of the bug 3113 and 3096 fixes. Between
them they limit the amount of RAM Squid uses for in-transit requests and
release the individual I/O blocks immediately.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.10 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.4Received on Tue Jan 11 2011 - 01:22:11 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 11 2011 - 12:00:04 MST