Re: [squid-users] 2.7 vs 3.0

> * Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>:
>
> > The above summary is inaccurate, IMO. Currently, Squid3 is better for
> > some production environments and Squid2 is better for some other
> > production environments. If you need ICAP/eCAP, SSL Bump, IPv6, or other
> > new features, try Squid3. If you do not need those features, there is no
> > pressure and you can benefit from Squid2 proven stability and recent
> > improvements that have not been ported to Squid3 yet.

On 20.12.07 20:19, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> I recently switchteed to 3.0 and found it (for my purposed) to be MORE
> stable than 2.6.x, which would crash ever so often

what's "the" purpose? I don't remember I've seen 2.6 crash...

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside...