* Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>:
> The above summary is inaccurate, IMO. Currently, Squid3 is better for
> some production environments and Squid2 is better for some other
> production environments. If you need ICAP/eCAP, SSL Bump, IPv6, or other
> new features, try Squid3. If you do not need those features, there is no
> pressure and you can benefit from Squid2 proven stability and recent
> improvements that have not been ported to Squid3 yet.
I recently switchteed to 3.0 and found it (for my purposed) to be MORE
stable than 2.6.x, which would crash ever so often
-- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-962 IT-Zentrum Standort CBF send no mail to plonk@charite.deReceived on Thu Dec 20 2007 - 12:19:48 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:00:02 MST