Re: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR

Andrew Sawyers wrote:

>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
>>Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:14 PM
>>To: Andrew Sawyers
>>Cc: 'Henrik Nordstrom'; 'Askar'; 'Squid Users'
>>Subject: RE: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR
>>
>>On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Any particular reason why you're after DR mode? I have several squids
>>>
>>>
>>load
>>
>>
>>>balanced in masq mode and we're able to handle more traffic then most
>>>
>>>
>>sites
>>
>>
>>>can aspire too - with basically 0 load on the LVS server.
>>>
>>>
>>If you do interception then LVS must not NAT the destination IP of the
>>connections, or else Squid has no way of figuring out what the original
>>destination was on HTTP/1.0 requests without Host header.
>>
>>
>
>Excellent, thanks - that solves that. :)
>
>
>>Regards
>>Henrik
>>
>>
>
>Andrew
>
>
>
Thank you all for your time and patience that clear the concept of LVS
to me, I will come back with my queries regarding LVS if we got problem
during actaul migration to LVS.

Regards
Received on Wed Feb 09 2005 - 21:50:23 MST