RE: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:14 PM
> To: Andrew Sawyers
> Cc: 'Henrik Nordstrom'; 'Askar'; 'Squid Users'
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR
>
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
>
> > Any particular reason why you're after DR mode? I have several squids
> load
> > balanced in masq mode and we're able to handle more traffic then most
> sites
> > can aspire too - with basically 0 load on the LVS server.
>
> If you do interception then LVS must not NAT the destination IP of the
> connections, or else Squid has no way of figuring out what the original
> destination was on HTTP/1.0 requests without Host header.

Excellent, thanks - that solves that. :)
>
> Regards
> Henrik

Andrew
Received on Wed Feb 09 2005 - 16:27:19 MST