Re: [squid-users] Re: forwarded_for

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:42:11 +0200

> >>That is an good idea and will indeed solve the conditional
> >>forwarded_for problem in a nice manner, much better than the
> >>forwarded_for directive can do.

> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >but is not usable when squid is compiled being strictly RFC compliant

On 13.09 10:26, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Then don't, and just constrain yourself in your configuration.
>
> The configure option only disables all directives which have the purpose
> of violating the RFC, it does not by itself change how Squid operates.

Of course, the above was just my argument for allowing ACL's on
forwarded_for.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Micro$oft random number generator: 0, 0, 0, 4.33e+67, 0, 0, 0...
Received on Mon Sep 13 2004 - 03:42:14 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Fri Oct 01 2004 - 12:00:02 MDT