RE: [squid-users] diskd VS aufs

From: Valentin Chopov <valentin@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:59:05 -0400 (EDT)

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Elsen Marc wrote:

>
>
>>
>> Thanks. I suppose I do not need to rebuild the cache (./squid
>> -z). But what
>
> No, you don't.
>
>> makes you conclude that "FreeBSD diskd is the better choice.
>> Under Solaris
>> and Linux use aufs."?
>>
>
> I seem to remember this was a FAQ, I may be wrong, at least I can't
> find it for the moment.
>> From what I remember : under FreeBSD support for shared mem is better
> which diskd heavily uses.
> Linux and Solaris are better on thread support, which aufs uses.
>
> M.
>
>

We are running Squid on FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT with aufs. It looks that KSE
improved the thread support in the FreeBSD.

Val
Received on Wed Jun 30 2004 - 07:59:10 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jul 01 2004 - 12:00:03 MDT