> Hi all,
>
> I've read that aufs and diskd are much much better than ufs.
> I am trying to
> decide between the two.
>
> I've read that aufs is the better one (in terms of performance), but
> probabability of crashing is higher?
I haven't seen problems with my aufs based configuration in months....
>
> I am willing to sacrifice a bit of performance gain but would
> like to have
> maximum stability. Can anyone advice which would be the better choice?
>
The choice is OS dependend : under FreeBSD diskd is the better choice.
Under Solaris and Linux use aufs.
M.
Received on Wed Jun 30 2004 - 00:02:04 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jul 01 2004 - 12:00:03 MDT