RE: [squid-users] diskd VS aufs

Thanks. I suppose I do not need to rebuild the cache (./squid -z). But what
makes you conclude that "FreeBSD diskd is the better choice. Under Solaris
and Linux use aufs."?

Regards
Liz

>From: "Elsen Marc" <elsen@imec.be>
>To: "Lizzy Dizzy" <lizzy_99@hotmail.com>,<squid-users@squid-cache.org>
>Subject: RE: [squid-users] diskd VS aufs
>Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:00:43 +0200
>
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've read that aufs and diskd are much much better than ufs.
> > I am trying to
> > decide between the two.
> >
> > I've read that aufs is the better one (in terms of performance), but
> > probabability of crashing is higher?
>
> I haven't seen problems with my aufs based configuration in months....
>
> >
> > I am willing to sacrifice a bit of performance gain but would
> > like to have
> > maximum stability. Can anyone advice which would be the better choice?
> >
> The choice is OS dependend : under FreeBSD diskd is the better choice.
> Under Solaris and Linux use aufs.
>
> M.
>

_________________________________________________________________
Find love on MSN Personals http://personals.msn.com.sg/
Received on Wed Jun 30 2004 - 01:45:55 MDT