Re: [squid-users] TCP_HIT with Surrogate-Control? -related to bug7?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:38:40 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Y Jones wrote:

> It seems like even though squid does not update the cache with
> headers from a 304 reply as recorded here:
> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=7
> It should still obey the max-age directive for Surrogate-Control,
> shouldn't it?

It should.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Nov 11 2003 - 13:38:49 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Blomberg David: "Re: [squid-users] Squid redirectors (squirm)"
Previous message: James Wilkinson: "[squid-users] Re: IE Hang 2.5 Stable 4"
In reply to: Y Jones: "Re: [squid-users] TCP_HIT with Surrogate-Control? -related to bug7?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:21:14 MST