AW: [squid-users] 2.5

Although I never tried it you could try it with RADIUS-Authentication.
AFAIK FreeRadius (http://www.freeradius.org) has a feature to disable
password-sharing (double-logins).
Good luck if you want to try...
OoLee

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Boosten, Peter [mailto:Peter.Boosten@dsm.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. März 2002 11:08
An: Squid-Users (E-mail)
Betreff: RE: [squid-users] 2.5

# -----Original Message-----
# From: Marc Elsen [mailto:marc.elsen@imec.be]
# Sent: Friday, 15 March 2002 11:00
# To: Boosten, Peter
# Cc: Squid-Users (E-mail)
# Subject: Re: [squid-users] 2.5
#
# > Does anyone know when 2.5 will become STABLE?
# >
# Guess you should be on the developers list for this one...
#

Hehehe, just for this question? Maybe on of you nonlurkers/lurkers know the
answer: I don't have anything useful to say on the developerslist.

Oke, then a real question:

Right now we have 18000+ users, of which 6000+ are allowed to browse the
internet. They have to authenticate via ncsa. The problem is, that some of
them share their account with other (non-authorized) users, and the problem
is growing. We have a security-policy for this kind of behaviour, but no-one
doesn't seem to care. The managingboard wants those users to authenticate
with their NT-account, because NT-passwords will not be shared that easily
(users could access other users personal email for instance).

NTMS-authentication is out of the question, as it will allow the
password/useraccount to go unencrypted over the network.
NTLM is an option, but only in 2.5.

Are there other options?

Peter

Disclaimer
1. This e-mail is for the intended recipient only. If you have received it
by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system;
access, disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone
else is prohibited.

2. If you as intended recipient have received this e-mail incorrectly,
please notify the sender (via e-mail) immediately. This e-mail is
confidential and may be legally privileged. DSM does not guarantee that the
information sent and/or received by or with this e-mail is correct and does
not accept any liability for damages related thereto.
Received on Fri Mar 15 2002 - 05:13:58 MST