Re: [squid-users] 2.5

"Boosten, Peter" wrote:
>
> # -----Original Message-----
> # From: Marc Elsen [mailto:marc.elsen@imec.be]
> # Sent: Friday, 15 March 2002 11:00
> # To: Boosten, Peter
> # Cc: Squid-Users (E-mail)
> # Subject: Re: [squid-users] 2.5
> #
> # > Does anyone know when 2.5 will become STABLE?
> # >
> # Guess you should be on the developers list for this one...
> #
>
> Hehehe, just for this question? Maybe on of you nonlurkers/lurkers know the
> answer: I don't have anything useful to say on the developerslist.
>
 I apologize to you : I did not mean to be offending.
 Yet the text below is interesting; and could have been in the
 original posting.

 Best Regards,

 Marc E.

> Oke, then a real question:
>
> Right now we have 18000+ users, of which 6000+ are allowed to browse the
> internet. They have to authenticate via ncsa. The problem is, that some of
> them share their account with other (non-authorized) users, and the problem
> is growing. We have a security-policy for this kind of behaviour, but no-one
> doesn't seem to care. The managingboard wants those users to authenticate
> with their NT-account, because NT-passwords will not be shared that easily
> (users could access other users personal email for instance).
>
> NTMS-authentication is out of the question, as it will allow the
> password/useraccount to go unencrypted over the network.
> NTLM is an option, but only in 2.5.
>
> Are there other options?
>
> Peter
>
> Disclaimer
> 1. This e-mail is for the intended recipient only. If you have received it
> by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system;
> access, disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone
> else is prohibited.
>
> 2. If you as intended recipient have received this e-mail incorrectly,
> please notify the sender (via e-mail) immediately. This e-mail is
> confidential and may be legally privileged. DSM does not guarantee that the
> information sent and/or received by or with this e-mail is correct and does
> not accept any liability for damages related thereto.

-- 
 'Time is a consequence of Matter thus
 General Relativity is a direct consequence of QM
 (M.E. Mar 2002)