> Also, in reading the documentation on the web, I saw somewhere
> recommended that RAID5 *not* be used as the target disk(s) for
> the cache. In trying to maintain uptime, should a disk go bad,
> using RAID5 would give us a WIN situation. What are the reasons
> to NOT use RAID5, and do you think they outweigh keeping a
RAID5 have sloooow writes.
Received on Fri Aug 17 2001 - 16:02:56 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:01:43 MST