Re: [squid-users] capacity of squid

Tons and tons of benchmarks have been done. ReiserFS is faster.

Mount notail, noatime...and be happy with a faster Squid.

http://www.swelltech.com/pengies/joe

Lots more details, results, instructions, etc.

Adam Lang wrote:

> Yeah, just read an interesting article about it... it would seem it would
> help to make Squid really hum.
>
> Has anyone on the list ran Squid with and without ReiserFS and noticed any
> magnitude of difference?
>
> Adam Lang
> Systems Engineer
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@squid-cache.org>
> To: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
> Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 12:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] capacity of squid
>
>
>
>> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
>>
>>> Why reiserFS?
>>
>> Reiserfs deals with lots-of-small-files and large-directories better
>> than traditional UFS based filesystems.
>>
>>
>>
>> Adrian

-- 
                                   --
                      Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
                  Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
                         http://www.swelltech.com