Re: [squid-users] capacity of squid

From: Adam Lang <aalang@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:36:50 -0500

Yeah, just read an interesting article about it... it would seem it would
help to make Squid really hum.

Has anyone on the list ran Squid with and without ReiserFS and noticed any
magnitude of difference?

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@squid-cache.org>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: <squid-users@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] capacity of squid

> On Fri, Mar 16, 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
> > Why reiserFS?
>
> Reiserfs deals with lots-of-small-files and large-directories better
> than traditional UFS based filesystems.
>
>
>
> Adrian
Received on Fri Mar 16 2001 - 12:34:36 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:58:41 MST