Re: [SQU] Parents Unreliable

No plans that I know of, but there is a related development. See the
"satellite" branch on squid.sourceforge.net

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Squid hacker
Magnus Ullberg wrote:
> 
> Ok, are there any plans on doing this or should I take a look at it myself?
> 
> Magnus Ullberg
> Network Coordinator
> 
> Area Bancshares Corporation
> Networking Department
> 230 Frederica St.
> Owensboro, KY 42301
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From:   Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@hem.passagen.se]
> Sent:   Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:47 AM
> To:     Magnus Ullberg
> Cc:     Squid-Users (E-mail)
> Subject:        Re: [SQU] Parents Unreliable
> 
> Not without changing the code I think.
> 
> If you do attempt to, please use Squid-2.4 as the base. There has been
> quite some changes in how DEAD/REVIVED parents are detected since
> Squid-2.3...
> 
> --
> Henrik Nordstrom
> Squid hacker
> 
> Magnus Ullberg wrote:
> >
> > Is there any way for Squid to sense that a parent is unreliable?
> > We had a situation where the NIC was going bad on one of the parent
> servers
> > ( we have 2 )
> > The logs showed parent DEAD/parent REVIVED, every few seconds.. When
> pinging
> > the server I got 40% packet loss..
> > My question is, is there a way to have squid ignore a parent for say an
> hour
> > if it fails more than 10 times in 5 minutes?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Magnus Ullberg
> > Network Coordinator
> >
> > Area Bancshares Corporation
> > Networking Department
> > 230 Frederica St.
> > Owensboro, KY 42301
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html