RE: [SQU] Parents Unreliable

From: Magnus Ullberg <UllbergM@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 08:27:02 -0600

Ok, are there any plans on doing this or should I take a look at it myself?

Magnus Ullberg
Network Coordinator

Area Bancshares Corporation
Networking Department
230 Frederica St.
Owensboro, KY 42301

 -----Original Message-----
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@hem.passagen.se]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:47 AM
To: Magnus Ullberg
Cc: Squid-Users (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [SQU] Parents Unreliable

Not without changing the code I think.

If you do attempt to, please use Squid-2.4 as the base. There has been
quite some changes in how DEAD/REVIVED parents are detected since
Squid-2.3...

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Squid hacker
Magnus Ullberg wrote:
> 
> Is there any way for Squid to sense that a parent is unreliable?
> We had a situation where the NIC was going bad on one of the parent
servers
> ( we have 2 )
> The logs showed parent DEAD/parent REVIVED, every few seconds.. When
pinging
> the server I got 40% packet loss..
> My question is, is there a way to have squid ignore a parent for say an
hour
> if it fails more than 10 times in 5 minutes?
> 
> Thanks,
> Magnus Ullberg
> Network Coordinator
> 
> Area Bancshares Corporation
> Networking Department
> 230 Frederica St.
> Owensboro, KY 42301
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
Received on Thu Dec 21 2000 - 07:30:01 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:57:05 MST