RE: Transparent Vs WCCP

Does anyone have details on how to setup fail-safes using Cisco Routers with
version 11 IOS

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Behr [mailto:dave@zol.co.zw]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 11:40 PM
> To: Network Admin
> Cc: squid-users@ircache.net
> Subject: RE: Transparent Vs WCCP
>
>
> Hi
>
> We use WCCP and one advantage I like is that it fails-safe if the proxy
> machine goes down - i.e. users browse the web directly. You can probably
> set this up with transparent proxy, but I think it would be more
> complicated.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Network Admin [mailto:cyber-scope@usa.net]
> Sent: 20 July 2000 06:46
> To: squid-users@ircache.net
> Subject: Transparent Vs WCCP
>
>
> Hi all ,
>
> am a little confused, transparent proxying and WCCP whats the real
> difference
> , implementing both with cisco will do the same --->
> redirect web traffic to cache engine (squid proxy) transparently to users
> (correct me if am wrong)then which is better ???
>
>
> Network Admin
> Cyber-scope
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>
>
Received on Sat Jul 22 2000 - 01:58:22 MDT