Re: Dynamic content policy update

Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I'm for it. Henrik suggested just "." (ie, everything) rather than
> specifically doing cgi-bin and ? URLs; is there any particular reason
> to have different "." vs "(cgi-bin|\?)" refresh pattern lines?

Well, I for one was keeping it seperate since there is already a
refresh_pattern for '.' and it has non-zero entries for some values.

To keep with the RFC as Mark pointed out it MUST have default "0 0% 0"
for dynamics, other GET/HEAD/POST are not so restricted for their defaults.

Not a strong reason really to keep the default from being "0 0% 0". If
others support the default idea then let it be so.

Amos

> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> Any objections to Squid2-HEAD and Squid 3-HEAD getting the caching
>> policy adjustment for dynamic pages Adrian proposed before xmas?
>>
>> Namely Dropping the
>> acl QUERY cgi-bin \?
>> cache deny QUERY
>>
>> Replacing it with:
>> refresh_pattern (cgi-bin|\?) 0 0% 0
>>
>>
>> No terrible side-effects here so far after a month of use. Just the
>> bugzilla Expires bug coming to view and being fixed.
>>
>> Amos
>> --
>> Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
>> There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.
>

-- 
Please use Squid 2.6STABLE17+ or 3.0STABLE1+
There are serious security advisories out on all earlier releases.