On Monday 04 August 2003 23.50, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Monday 04 August 2003 19.31, Duane Wessels wrote:
> > It seems wrong to me that MAGIC1 is proportional to the SQUARE of
> > the number of cache_dir's. I could even argue that it should
> > be logarithmic since performance doesn't really scale linearly
> > with #disks or cache_dirs.
>
> Indeed.
>
> > Also I would suggest that these calculations use the number
> > of AUFS cache_dirs, which might be less than the total number.
> > Kind of hard to put that in a #define though.
What do you think of the patch in Bug #732?
Regards
Henrik
Received on Mon Aug 04 2003 - 16:18:15 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:20:26 MST