On Tuesday 10 June 2003 11.37, ralf wrote:
> I think the real problem is that some pointers are not reset
> properly. Here is a patch:
>
> diff -u -r1.38.6.11.2.2 cache_cf.c
> --- cache_cf.c 7 Apr 2003 13:28:50 -0000 1.38.6.11.2.2
> +++ cache_cf.c 10 Jun 2003 09:03:00 -0000
> @@ -2145,6 +2145,7 @@
> cbdataFree(current_node);
> current_node = next_node;
> }
> + cfg->service_head = NULL;
> }
> }
Thanks. A slight variation of this patch has been committed to the
icap-2_5 branch. [patch attached]
Regards
Henrik
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:20:07 MST