On 29 Aug 2001 18:28:19 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > I don't think having it in 2.5 poses any stability risk - as nothing
> > uses it.
>
> So why then have it in 2.5?
>
> refcount is as announced in the queue for 2.6. Before 2.6 can start we need
> to get 2.5 a bit more bugtested. If we start on 2.6 now 2.5 will most
> likely loose in testing which in the end bites us back.
>
> My goal is that we should be able to branch 2.5 within a month. As soon as
> this happens most of the queue will get merged into HEAD, including
> refcount.
ok.
Rob
Received on Wed Aug 29 2001 - 16:40:30 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:14:17 MST