Re: bugzilla query:

We don't have resources to assign a specific person to track bugs. Doing
so will only cause a backlog. In my opinion it is better if squid-bugs
is the owner of all new bugs.

There also needs to be a periodic report sent to squid-bugs listing all
open bugs and a short description of each. Without this bugs will with
no doubt get stuck in bugzilla...

--
Henrik
Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@hem.passagen.se>
> To: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
> Cc: "Squid-Dev (E-mail)" <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:56 PM
> Subject: Re: bugzilla query:
> 
> > Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > > Doesn't someone get emailed automatically when a new bug is logged?
> If
> > > the component owner is the one emailed, feel free to make me the
> "auth"
> > > owner, and I'll act on those bugs fairly quickly (the next weekend
> after
> > > the logging, at worst).
> >
> > That is the intention, but does not work entirely the way intended yet
> > it seems..
> >
> > --
> > Henrik
> >
> 
> Currently the component owners are:
> 
> auth wessels Authentication modules
> doc wessels Documentation, such as it is
> feature squid-bugs@squid-cache.org Requests for new features
> lib wessels Library routines
> src wessels The main source tree
> 
> Which means that wessels@www.squid-cache.org will be emailed. I don't
> know how much time Duane has, but I assume it's fairly limited? Perhaps
> if we nominate a owner for each of the five current modules, and they
> are the ones to get emailed on new bug creation. The concept being that
> an individual who is a component owner is responsible for reviewing new
> bugzilla entries within a preset timeframe, and either assigning to a
> more relevant person, or addressing themselves. I.E. the owner of the
> squid-doc project at sourceforge might be a better choice for the "doc"
> component, rather than Duane.
> 
> Please don't think I'm pushing this: I'm very happy _not_ to be the
> actual auth "owner" and for Duane to assign auth-related things to me
> when it's appropriate. But on the other hand, delegating this sort of
> thing out can be beneficial.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Rob