Joe Cooper wrote:
>
> Yes, the code seems pretty solid at this point.
>
> Though it has blown up under the boiler workload, and I don't see why,
> it wasn't yet being overloaded--though the load was high (190 reqs/sec)
> the response time and hit rate were still great. Nevermind. Tracked it
> down to a system error between the chair and the keyboard (log device
> filled up). Ok..Yep, looks very solid so far.
>
> Anyway, I'll have some benchmark results for this version to post in
> another ~4 hours or so.
Great news.
Will commit the code to 2.4 in a few days unless someone has any reason
not to.
/Henrik
Received on Thu Nov 02 2000 - 16:41:41 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:54 MST