Yes, the code seems pretty solid at this point.
Though it has blown up under the boiler workload, and I don't see why,
it wasn't yet being overloaded--though the load was high (190 reqs/sec)
the response time and hit rate were still great. Nevermind. Tracked it
down to a system error between the chair and the keyboard (log device
filled up). Ok..Yep, looks very solid so far.
Anyway, I'll have some benchmark results for this version to post in
another ~4 hours or so.
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
> Joe Cooper wrote:
>
> > If you plan to use async i/o in the future (Henrik pretty much has it
> > fixed in 2.4 as far as I can tell...I'm starting heavier stress testing
> > today)
>
> So the new code actually seems to work, or have you not started the
> testing yet?
>
> /Henrik
--
Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
Affordable Web Caching Proxy Appliances
http://www.swelltech.com
Received on Thu Nov 02 2000 - 01:19:07 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:12:54 MST