On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Owen Crow <owen.crow_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Consider this a reply to Kinkie and Eliezer.
>
> Yes, I expect my setup is unusual, but that's why I'm trying to get
> advice from others who might have a similar setup.
>
> I run the proxy as the main destination for a wildcard DNS. This is
> our many tenants use URLs in the wildcard domain (lets call it
> "*.wild.com") and the proxy connects them to the various backend
> services based on the hostname such as:
>
> acme-www.wild.com connects to the WWW server for Acme customer
> beta-www.wild.com connects to a similar but different WWW server for
> Beta customer.
>
> For each customer there are 5-10 unique hostnames to keep the services
> separate. We do this as it is much simpler than URL-rewriting (or at
> least it seemed so to me at the beginning).
>
> In addition, our proxy listens on about 8 different ports
> (80/443/8080, etc) for different services. The different ports require
> 7 ACLs that excludes the other ports that are not for that one
> service/port combination.
>
> I can get more specific if anyone is interested.
> I use make+M4 macros to generate the squid.conf file from a source
> file and then separate all the customers into individual configuration
> files based on a conf.d directory.
Hi,
yes, it could be interesting. Not the full configuration, which is
most likely confidential.
But the template you are using for a single entry may be interesting
and maybe give us enough information to understand if there are
opportunities for optimization.
Kinkie
Received on Sun Jun 29 2014 - 14:55:15 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jun 29 2014 - 12:00:05 MDT