On 29/04/2014 4:16 p.m., Dan Charlesworth wrote:
> Hi Lawrence
>
> I think that's the most extensive list of refresh patterns I've seen in one
> place, for a forward proxy. Props.
>
> Is anyone else using a collection like this and care to comment on its
> performance / viability?
You can find many similar lists in the archives of this mailing list if
you pick a really weird file extension type and search for it plus
"refresh_pattern". eg.
<https://www.google.co.nz/search?q=tgz+refresh_pattern+site%3Awww.squid-cache.org>
As for viability. It uses most of the HTTP violation refresh_pattern
options based just on test for "file extension" patterns. I have no
doubt that they cause many things to store and log as HITs but the
reliability of the responses coming out of that cache is suspect.
Amos
Received on Tue Apr 29 2014 - 13:45:01 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 29 2014 - 12:00:07 MDT