Hey,
It might be not understood but StoreID in squid 3.4.4 might help with that.
I noticed that you are using SLES which I do not have a build node for yet.
Since there are dynamic variables in the url it is hard to cache it.
Note that there are other options in the request and response that can
cause the object to be un-cachable.
I can think about a pattern for StoreID to be used.
^http:\/\/[\d\w\-]+\.c\.pack\.google\.com\/([\S]+)\?
http://google_packs.squid.internal/$1
Which should work for many cases even with no strict refresh_pattern.
One of the issues is that you will need to fetch the full object when a
206 request is being pulled throw squid.
Eliezer
On 04/14/2014 10:32 AM, Jasper Van Der Westhuizen wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'm trying to cache chrome updates, but I see it always fetches over and
> over again.
>
> I have the following refresh pattern in my config.
>
> refresh_pattern -i pack.google.com/.*\.(exe|crx) 10080 80% 43200
> override-expire override-lastmod ignore-no-cache ignore-reload
> reload-into-ims ignore-private
>
> I see the following behavior in my logs. This is for the same
> client(source). Multiple entries, like it gets downloaded over and over
> again.
> Logs:
>
> 1397459574.511 199 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx TCP_MISS/302 1400 GET
> http://cache.pack.google.com/edgedl/chrome/win/34.0.1847.116_33.0.1750.154_chrome_updater.exe - DEFAULT_PARENT/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx text/html
> 1397459579.924 4794 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx TCP_MISS/206 141330 GET
> http://r2---sn-pn-woce.c.pack.google.com/edgedl/chrome/win/34.0.1847.116_33.0.1750.154_chrome_updater.exe? - DEFAULT_PARENT/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx application/x-msdos-program
> 1397459591.067 548 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx TCP_MISS/302 1400 GET
> http://cache.pack.google.com/edgedl/chrome/win/34.0.1847.116_33.0.1750.154_chrome_updater.exe - DEFAULT_PARENT/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx text/html
> 1397459596.709 4917 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx TCP_MISS/206 283744 GET
> http://r2---sn-pn-woce.c.pack.google.com/edgedl/chrome/win/34.0.1847.116_33.0.1750.154_chrome_updater.exe? - DEFAULT_PARENT/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> application/x-msdos-program
>
> Is my refresh pattern incorrect?
>
Received on Tue Apr 15 2014 - 17:44:22 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 16 2014 - 12:00:05 MDT