Re: [squid-users] Fwd: Squid and large object

From: Nick Hill <nick_at_nickhill.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:05:21 +0100

This is down to a cost-benefit analysis.

Does the current icap implementation cost more than the benefits of
the security it brings?

Or
Would a little less security but more convenient functionality be
better or worse?
If better, would the costs of implementing that functionality be
greater or less than benefits derived?

A system which delivered the data to the client slower than the data
received, and performed periodic checks as well as a check when data
download complete may have a better cost-benefit trade-off.

Inconvenient security can become insecure as users will look for ways
to bypass the security.

On 15 April 2014 12:54, Bjoern Meier <bjoern.meier_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
>
> 2014-04-15 13:52 GMT+02:00 Antony Stone <Antony.Stone_at_squid.open.source.it>:
>
>> Surely you don't want users to get even the first parts of a downloaded file
>> until it's been checked to make sure it's safe?
>
> right, my mistake.
>
> Greetings,
> Björn
Received on Tue Apr 15 2014 - 12:05:28 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Apr 16 2014 - 12:00:05 MDT