[squid-users] Re: Do we have an algorithm to define the cachabillity of an object by the request and response?

>If the range is done properly with Range: header then the future random
ranges can be served as HIT on the cached object.<
Yes.
But that is NOT the actual state with youtube; only history, unfortunately.

>Problem remains if anything in the URL changes and/or the range detail
is sent in the URL query-string values.<
That IS actual state.

And it looks like, that the range details, as you call it, are NOT
repeatable ANY MORE (which means, the WERE), even in case you request 2 time
the same video from same client, just one after the other.
That is, what I meant with "random range". Will check "random range" in more
detail some time in the future.

--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Do-we-have-an-algorithm-to-define-the-cachabillity-of-an-object-by-the-request-and-response-tp4665473p4665497.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.