I am using rock on one of SSD drives to check its performance .
before choosing rock the filesystem was reiserfs because it shows good
performance in huge number of little files but i read somewhere the rock
uses one big file . so i choose ext4 with discard to got the benefits of
discard/trim .
the rock creates one file with the name rock in /cache2 directory with the
size 105906MB from begin and still it has same size . but "df " shows 27%
used and grows each day .
1. is the max-size=31000 is the maximum size rock may store ? if not what is
the max safe value ?
2. is my fstab line shows bellow optimal for rock ? i have created it with
"mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdb" on OCZ-VERTEX3 120GB
3. it seems the the disk is more idle since switched to rock . how to force
it use the disk more aggressive ?
4. the following is output of dumpe2fs of that drive . is it better to
resize the block size to 32KB which is the size of rock store size ? any
other suggestion for filesystem ?
dumpe2fs /dev/sdb | more
-- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/rock-questions-tp4662816.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.Received on Wed Oct 23 2013 - 10:13:56 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Oct 23 2013 - 12:00:06 MDT