Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid 3.2.6 & hot object cache

From: Loïc BLOT <loic.blot_at_unix-experience.fr>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:51:08 +0100

Yes, but i'm not satisfied of performances. FFS is too slow for high
used squid and the performance gain is visible.
It's right i use redundant cache under memory, but it's only a 4Gbit
cache (then 8Gbit).
Maybe it will be useful to remove disk_cache, but is this possible ?

-- 
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT, UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le jeudi 24 janvier 2013 à 03:06 +0000, RW a écrit :
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 12:42:37 +0100
> Loïc BLOT wrote:
> 
> 
> > under OpenBSD i have switched from FFS2 disk cache to mfs disk cache
> > and performances were massively improved.
> 
> On the face of it that sounds like a bad idea. Not only does mfs have
> additional overheads over memory cache, but it will also waste some
> physical memory to store deleted objects that are no longer accessible
> to squid.
> 
> Did you try setting noatime and enabling soft-updates before switching
> to mfs?  
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thu Jan 24 2013 - 06:48:19 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 25 2013 - 12:00:05 MST