Re: [squid-users] Re: Squid 3.2.6 & hot object cache

From: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt_at_charite.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:50:19 +0100

* Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
> On 22/01/2013 2:00 a.m., babajaga wrote:
> >>Rock and COSS storage types however are far more optimized for speed,
> >using both disk and RAM storage in ther normal "disk" configuration. <
> >
> >Amos,
> >
> >haven't you been a little bit too "generous" in your comments, especially
> >this referred one ?
>
> I don't think so. They *have* been optimized for speed and are
> measurably so.
> I made no comment about bug-free state in any of the disk I/O modues.
> Just about speed versus a RAM disk.

"Of course it doesn't work, but look how fast it is" (just a little
joke, no offense meant)

Anyway, maybe I'll try those in a new setup (new machines are upcoming). 

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt                   Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin
ralf.hildebrandt_at_charite.de        Campus Benjamin Franklin
http://www.charite.de              Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203 Berlin
Geschäftsbereich IT, Abt. Netzwerk fon: +49-30-450.570.155
Received on Tue Jan 22 2013 - 09:50:29 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 22 2013 - 12:00:04 MST