RE: [squid-users] Valgrind results on 3.2.1

From: Jenny Lee <bodycare_5_at_live.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:16:09 +0000

Why don't you try concatenating your 50+ mails to one instead of dispatching a new mail whenever something comes to your mind? This is a public mailing list, not your personal IM platform.
 
Jenny

> From: tcr_at_raynersw.com
> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 02:05:50 -0700
> To: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Valgrind results on 3.2.1
>
> I just ran mgr:mem on another server that's been up for a while and does heavy traffic.
>
> Its table of allocations accounts for about 550 MB total (which seems about like what the server should reasonably be using given my config). But my squid process on that server has, after a few days, grown to:
> VIRT: 4.5g
> RES: 4.5g
>
> It is already causing swapping and needs to be restarted.
>
> So mgr:mem seems to show that squid's memory management knows nothing about where that extra 4g of allocations comes from.
>
> How to debug something like this? Valgrind seems not to classify these allocations as leaks, but they are there.
>
> -Ty
>
>
Received on Thu Sep 27 2012 - 09:16:22 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Sep 27 2012 - 12:00:13 MDT