On 8/8/2012 6:49 PM, Hugo Deprez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since I changed the configuration
> memory usage is growing slowy.
>
> Now squid is using 17% of 4GB
>
> Eliezer, I am not sure to understand. But I am using two VM,
> active/passive setup with a corosync VIP.
>
I remembered someone talking here about a VM that was replicated and
caused squid to leak memory.
so I asked if it's a VM that was cloned or not to verify it.
for me it still odd that a cloned VM will cause such a thing so I will
just say it's seems like a bogus alarm set by someone by false assumption.
just curios about this cluster setup you have there:
can you give some more details about it? (email me directly)
I am working on a cluster setup of squid tproxy balanced on a routing level.
Thanks,
Elizer
> I will consider upgrading one member of the cluster to 3.1.20 (squeeze
> packages). DO you think this will sole the issue ?
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
> On 8 August 2012 05:30, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>> On 08.08.2012 02:35, Simon Roscic wrote:
<SNIP>
> >
>> I think this is probably:
>> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3605
>>
>> Can you start with the cachemgr memory usage report and confirm whether the
>> same FwdServer excessive memory usage is seen?
>>
>>
>> Amos
>>
-- Eliezer Croitoru https://www1.ngtech.co.il IT consulting for Nonprofit organizations eliezer <at> ngtech.co.ilReceived on Wed Aug 08 2012 - 18:35:21 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 09 2012 - 12:00:03 MDT