On 06.03.2012 14:15, david wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> On 06.03.2012 02:07, FredB wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Amos, like I said in bug report, Squid 3.2 is very stable with your
>>> last fix, and Alex's patch which is not already included in truck,
>>> and
>>> I would like to know the schedule for an official stable release,
>>> approximately of course (before this summer, end of year ?)
>>
>> The checklist I have to work by is at
>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ReleaseProcess#Squid-3
>> We are looping around at the "freeze" stage (3), waiting to reach 0
>> major+ bugs before we can start the stable release countdown stages
>> (4+).
>>
>>
>> We are intending 3.2 to supersede and obsolete all 3.x and 2.x
>> series releases. Which means there are just over 50 bugs rated major
>> or higher which need to be confirmed as fixed in 3.2, or downgraded
>> before 3.2 can start its stability countdown.
>
> I haven't checked in the last several months, but has there been any
> progress on the fact that ACLs are so much more expensive to evaluate
> in 3.x than in 1.x or 2.x?
>
> David Lang
regex optimizations was done after your last message. Since your
worst-case tests had many regex I was hoping to hear back from you about
whether that was significant progress or more was needed.
The other major optimizations have been mostly in request and DNS
handling.
Amos
Received on Tue Mar 06 2012 - 02:42:52 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Mar 06 2012 - 12:00:02 MST