On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:59:29 +1300
Amos Jeffries wrote:
> They are using a standard cache_peer parent relationship to fetch
> MISS traffic through a second filtering proxy of their own design.
> There is no bypass of Squid happening.
But I wonder what accounts for the OPs statement:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:21:33 -0700
- Mikael - wrote:
> > I tested this and that implementation really, really speeds things
> > up.
I'm wondering if perhaps the squids were cleared between tests, but
the parent cache was left, giving Untangle an unfair advantage. Or is it
really faster?
Received on Mon Nov 28 2011 - 17:20:18 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 28 2011 - 12:00:02 MST