On 13/10/11 20:54, Fred B wrote:
>
> ----- "Amos Jeffries" a écrit :
>
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:45:49 +0200, Jean-Philippe Menil wrote:
>>> Le 12/10/2011 09:12, Fred B a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps a link with
>> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3358
>>> Ok, now my delay_pools seems to work with one or multiple workers
>>> without problems.
>>>
>>> Delay_pools are fully functionnal if, and only if i had the
>> following
>>> rule at the end of my delay_pool declarations:
>>> delay_access 1 deny all
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>
>> Aha! patch about to hit the bug. Please test.
>>
>> Amos
>
> Sorry Amos, I can't test for the moment with the lastest cvs (bug 3377,3361)
> And the patch doesn't work with Squid 3.2.0.8-20110615 the last who seem run with my configuration
>
> I will try with the next release
Oh well. If you are seeing that odd delay behaviour in 3.2.0.8 the fix
won't help. It is about changes made in 3.2.0.10, which seem to be
Jean-Philippe's problem.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.15 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.12Received on Thu Oct 13 2011 - 08:19:14 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 13 2011 - 12:00:04 MDT