Re: [squid-users] Transparent / Standard mode comparative

From: David Touzeau <david_at_touzeau.eu>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:45:23 +0200

Le mercredi 12 octobre 2011 à 09:46 +0530, nipun_mlist Assam a écrit :
> Squid in tproxy mode, doesn't work with HTTPS most probably. Secondly,
> it doesn't spoof the client IP. I have fixed the issues for my work.
> But wondering if the fix is already available somewhere.
> -Nipu
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 4:32 PM, David Touzeau <david_at_touzeau.eu> wrote:
> > Le mardi 11 octobre 2011 à 11:50 +0200, Fred B a écrit :
> >> ----- "David Touzeau" <david_at_touzeau.eu> a écrit :
> >>
> >> > Dear all
> >> >
> >> > I would like to know what are the limitations using squid in
> >> > transparent
> >> > mode between using squid in standard mode
> >> >
> >> > I know there are
> >> >
> >> > Transparent mode limitations :
> >> > No user authentication method.
> >> > No all HTTPS features.
> >> >
> >> > Is someone know what are others limitations ?
> >> >
> >> > Best regards.
> >>
> >> Hi David
> >>
> >> See http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/InterceptionProxy -> Concepts of Interception Caching
> >>
> >> Fred
> >
> >
> > Thanks Fred, this is what i would like to find !
> >
> >

Just a question Nipu,

what are real benefits to use "Tproxy" instead just set an iptables
rules and set squid as transparent mode ?
Received on Wed Oct 12 2011 - 08:45:37 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 20 2011 - 12:00:03 MDT