Re: [squid-users] Preparing squid training

On 15/09/11 17:59, Jorge Armando Medina wrote:
> On 08/18/2011 08:16 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 19/08/11 07:35, Jorge Armando Medina wrote:
>>> On 08/18/2011 02:03 PM, squidbob wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm planning to prepare squid training which firstly ill give for the
>>>> local requests then maybe to remote sites or online. Basically it may
>>>> include teorical knowledge (preknowledge TCIP, squid introduction
>>>> etc), handson (installation, configuration, different deployment
>>>> teories, troubleshooting /cases etc). It may also be more divided
>>>> trainings like basic and advanced. Ill like to have your opsinion
>>>> about a squid training and any recommendations feedback for preparing
>>>> it (include this do that etc).
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>
>>> The last months, I have been writting a big manual for squid proxy
>>> implementations, it is in spanish, I use it for courseware here at the
>>> company, It is almost everything I know about squid implementation.
>>>
>>> The docto is here:
>>>
>>> http://tuxjm.net/docs/Manual_de_Instalacion_de_Servidor_Proxy_Web_con_Ubuntu_Server_y_Squid/html-multiples/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Jorge Armando Medina:
>> Is this at a stable location I can add to the non-English documentation
>> index?
>
> Yes, that is the official location, I hope you can add the document to
> the spanish index.

I have added a link here (when the mirrors pick it up):
http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/

>> Taking a read through some early pages I find its talking about
>> 3.0.STABLE1. You may want to update build examples to the current Ubuntu
>> Lucid supported release 3.0.STABLE19 and mention why its not documenting
>> a current 3.x release.
>
> You are right, I have to update the build process, Im preparing a
> procedure for compiling the latest squid 3.x squid from sources and
> using 3.1 using the your PPA for lucid.
>

Um. I'm hoping not to have to keep that PPA alternative up long term.
Fine for a web document, but if this goes to print its probably best
left out of hard copy.

>>
>> I'd also advise using the squidclient instead of squid3-client and
>> squid-cgi instead of squid3-cgi packages. They are not related to the
>> main squid version and these *3 alternative packages have been dropped
>> in current Debian/Ubuntu versions.
>
> I going to try this and then update the document.

They are identical in usage, setup and behaviours. Just package names
different.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.15
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.11