On 29/04/11 19:42, Mathias Fischer wrote:
> On 28/04/11 15:12, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 28/04/11 20:19, Mathias Fischer wrote:
>> Hmm, I thought we corrected that the same way in both 3.1 and 2.7.
>> 3.0 and 2.6 certainly had that behaviour.
>
> I also compared 2.6 and 3.0 -- I see the same differences as between 2.7
> and 3.1.
>
> > Pinning links one server FD per client connection, kind of an
> > independent and special type of persistence. It should not be showing
> > this behaviour, though yes it also will cause a multitude of server
> > connections.
>
> I was assuming, that in order to achieve connection pinning, also the
> connection handling to cache peers has been changed.
>
>> Current 2.7 and 3.1 should have (peer_IP, domain_name) as the pconn key.
>> There can be multiple duplicates of course up to as many as needed to
>> handle peak load (moderated by how fast the peer closes them).
>> We have a re-structuring if the conn and pconn handling coming to 3.2
>> shortly (a few weeks) which removes the domain name from the pconn key.
>
> OK. I will keep an eye on that.
>
> In the meantime we will investigate the impact of a decreased pconn
> timeout.
>
> Kind regards,
> Mathias
As a side note. Squid does not obey the HTTP "Keep-Alive:" header TTLs.
Any patches to fix that omission are very welcome.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12 Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.7 and 3.1.12.1Received on Fri Apr 29 2011 - 08:01:17 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Apr 29 2011 - 12:00:05 MDT