Please keep the replies on the mailing list for others to benefit from.
I charge for private assistance.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:32:56 +0200, Ümit Kablan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/2/22 Amos Jeffries :
>> On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:24:39 +0200, Ümit Kablan wrote:
>>>
>>> 2011/2/21 Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:19:53 +0200, Ümit Kablan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> -------
>>>>> GET
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> /search?hl=tr&source=hp&biw=1276&bih=823&q=eee+ktu&aq=0&aqi=g10&aql=&oq=eee&fp=64d53dfd7a69225a&tch=3&ech=1ψ=6UBOTbHmCtah_Aa2haXRDw12969740590425&wrapid=tlif129697480915821&safe=active
>>>>> HTTP/1.1
>>>>
>>>> Note the missing http://domain details in the URL. This is not a
>>>> browser->proxy HTTP request. It is a browsers->origin request.
>>>>
>>>> IIRC interception of this type of request does not work in
>>>> Windows, since
>>>> the kernel NAT details are not available without proprietary
>>>> third-party
>>>> network drivers. Look at WPAD configuration of the localnet
>>>> browsers
>>>> instead, that way they will send browser->proxy requests nicely.
>>>
>>> Exactly! The working requests are all starting with http://domain/
>>> as
>>> you mentioned. (I must say I couldn't capture loopback network
>>> packets
>>> ...
>>
>> Squid needs to be configured via the http_port to know what
>> mode/type of
>> traffic it is going to receive. The browsers need to be sending the
>> right
>> type as well.
>
> I have
> -----
> http_port 3128
> -----
> in my configuration. Do I miss something?
Yes. But you keep omitting the details of *how* browsers are getting to
squid, so we can't tell if you are attempting to run a transparent proxy
or a reverse proxy. Two very different configurations both in Squid and
in the network underneath.
Please confirm your network layout and traffic flows including software
which is involved on each related machine.
You say this Squid is on Windows where interception type of transparent
proxy is not possible for free, but keep mentioning the public website
google as working.
I suspect you are trying to perform NAT interception on a separate box
to Squid. Which is highly dangerous.
>>
>> There are a number of workaround, So we are at the question of what
>> exactly
>> are you trying to do with the traffic? what does your goal look
>> like?
>
> I have a slow internet connection all machines connecting to internet
> individually so I simply want squid work correctly to make things
> faster.
Details please. So far we know this:
When failing
Clients traffic passes through gateway box __ which is running __ and
does __ to the connections, then __ and then __ and Squid sends an
"invalid request" message back.
When working
Clients traffic passes through gateway box __ which is running __ and
does __ to the connections, then __ and then __ and Squid fetches the
request over a slow Internet link and sends it back.
>
> Browser doesnt send correct http://domain/xyz address to the proxy
> instead it sends GET /xyz and it does seem to be same on firefox, ie
> and chrome. The browser additionally send Host: www.xxx.com data with
> missing url info. What I thought of was telling squid concatenate
> these data: "http://" "www.xyz.com" "/xyz" if possible.
>
> Everything works correctly at localhost and it seems strange to me.
Localhost is very special.
>
> When you enter google everything is fine, when you hit keys google
> gets completion successfully BUT when you hit enter the browser just
> sends /xyz unlike before.
>
> I am sending my configuration for Squid 2.7STABLE8 downloaded from
> http://squid.acmeconsulting.it/index.html.
>
>>
>> Amos
Received on Thu Feb 24 2011 - 01:27:56 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 25 2011 - 12:00:03 MST