On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:39:07AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 24.06.10 10:05, senthilkumaar2021 wrote:
> > In order to use Anti virus scanning with Squid proxy which one is
> > suitable whether C-ICAP with ClamAV or HAVP with ClamAv.We are having
> > request rate around 300-350 re/sec.Which one will handle more requests
> > with ease?We have made some basic tests and it seems c-icap will handle
> > more requests.
>
> then it's apparently true. and I found that more feasdible than using any
> kind of parent caches for squid
HAVP is not very optimized in it's architecture, sadly no one has time to
improve it. ICAP certainly is the easier choice and more manageable for such
rates. For lesser rates HAVP does have it's advantages.
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/201003/0400.html
Received on Thu Jun 24 2010 - 07:51:37 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Jun 24 2010 - 12:00:03 MDT