RE: [squid-users] Google SSL searches

From: Dean Weimer <dweimer_at_ORSCHELN.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 09:46:11 -0500

Henrik,
        In cases like this, is it better to use the port 443 acl like you did in your example, instead of the proto HTTPS option? Just curious if the port acl is faster or has some other advantage over the proto acl.

Thanks,
     Dean Weimer
     Network Administrator
     Orscheln Management Co
     Phone: (660) 269-3448
     Fax: (660) 269-3950


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordström [mailto:henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 5:58 PM
> To: Dave Burkholder
> Cc: squid-users_at_squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Google SSL searches
>
> tor 2010-05-27 klockan 15:35 -0400 skrev Dave Burkholder:
>
> > Is there some way to specify via a Squid ACL that requests via port 443 to
> > google.com are blocked, but requests to google.com via port 80 are
> allowed?
>
> acl https port 443
> acl google dstdomain google.com
> http_access deny https google
>
> Regards
> Henrik

Received on Fri May 28 2010 - 14:47:28 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri May 28 2010 - 12:00:06 MDT