[squid-users] Reg wccp

  Hi All

Thank u very much for the reply

Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:48:56 +1100, "Michael Bowe" <mbowe_at_pipeline.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Michael Bowe [mailto:mbowe_at_pipeline.com.au]
>>>
>>>> From: senthilkumaar2021 [mailto:senthilkumaar2021_at_gmail.com]
>>>>
>>>> wccp2_service_info 80 protocol=tcp flags=dst_ip_hash priority=240
>>>> ports=80
>>>> wccp2_service_info 90 protocol=tcp flags=src_ip_hash,ports_source
>>>> priority=240 ports=80
>>>>
>>>> (for router ip replaced the gateway ip of the squid machine)
>>>>
>>> I think you have the hash stuff wrong, isn't service 80 meant to be
>>> src_ip_hash and service 90 meant to be dst_ip_hash?
>>>
>> Interesting, there seems to be conflicting advice in the wiki
>>
>> This page here
>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/FullyTransparentWithTPROXY
>> shows it (from Steve Wilton):
>> 80 src_ip_hash
>> 90 dst_ip_hash,ports_source
>>
>> And then further down the page shows it:
>> 80 dst_ip_hash
>> 90 src_ip_hash,ports_source
>>
>> And this page
>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Tproxy4
>> shows it (from Steve Wilton):
>> 80 dst_ip_hash
>> 90 src_ip_hash,ports_source
>>
>> On my busy TPROXY4 clusters we have it:
>> 80 src_ip_hash
>> 90 dst_ip_hash,ports_source
>>
>> Hmm, which way is actually correct?
>>
>> Michael.
>>
>
> AFAIK they are arbitrary tag labels. If anyone can confirm/deny that with
> certainty it would be a help.
>
> The wiki needs updating to be consistent shortly anyway. Thanks for
> noticing that.
>
> Amos
>
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 05 2010 - 10:41:52 MST