Re: [squid-users] time to pack?

Le Mercredi 10 Février 2010 16:07:17, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:51:16 -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
>
> <luis.daniel.lucio_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Le Mardi 9 Février 2010 22:57:58, Amos Jeffries a écrit :
> >> Henrik Nordström wrote:
> >> > tis 2010-02-09 klockan 15:18 -0600 skrev Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz:
> >> >> Le Mercredi 30 Juillet 2008 22:24:35, Henrik Nordstrom a écrit :
> >> >>> On tor, 2008-07-31 at 11:26 +0900, S.KOBAYASHI wrote:
> >> >>>> Hello developer,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I'm looking for the evidence for accessing ICAP server. Is there
>
> its
>
> >> >>>> log in any log files such as access.log, cache.log?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The ICAP server should have logs of it's own.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> There is no information in the Squid logs on which iCAP servers
>
> were
>
> >> >>> used for the request/response.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards
> >> >>> Henrik
> >> >>
> >> >> I wonder if using squidclient mngr:xxXX we could see some info
>
> about
>
> >> >> icap, where?
> >> >
> >> > Seems not.
> >> >
> >> > You can however increase the debug level of section 93 to have ICAP
> >> > spew
> >> > out lots of information in cache.log.
> >> >
> >> > debug_options ALL,1 93,5
> >> >
> >> > should do the trick I think.
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> > Henrik
> >>
> >> Squid-3.1 and later provide some little ICAP service logging in
> >> access.log.
> >> http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/logformat/
> >>
> >>
> >> Amos
> >
> > Do you think we could backport that logging in access.log capabilitie.
>
> I
>
> > may
> > do that but just tellme what file to
> > backport.
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > LD
>
> It was quite a major change. For only a small benefit. It won't be done
> upstream sorry.
>
> 3.1 is out as stable in less than 60 days though if everything goes to
> plan.
> (one blocker bug to go. Major, but solo).
>
> Amos

Thanx Amos,

some strategic questions.

how status of sq 3.1 is about:
- ICAP support
- SSLbump
- ESI
- Reverse proxy

I'd like to use ESI support to log some html payload of specifique sites. As
far as I know, sslbump will help avoidme to inverse-proxying any site.

I'm mandriva squid maintainer and as far as i know, we will freze distro about
april 2010. Do you thing 3.1 will be out by april? What kind of block bug
are you talking about.

TIA

LD
Received on Wed Feb 24 2010 - 06:12:23 MST